twitter twitter  twitter twitter twitter twitter twitter twitter  twitter twitter 

Soon Israel Will Be Left With Just One Friend in the World

The UN resolution and Kerry's speech have essentially ended the era of right-wing settlement.

At the end of the first day of the French Revolution in 1789, King Louis XVI wrote in his diary, “Nothing.” He didn’t think anything had happened; there was nothing to report or to get excited about. He eventually paid for this attitude with his head. Such complete denial of events of apparently fateful importance isn’t characteristic only of distant history. Most of those responding to UN Security Council Resolution 2334 and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry’s address are making the same mistake.
For most of them, the resolution, as well as the speech about the important decisions Israel now faces, were too little and too late. From the moment the new U.S. president assumes office in three weeks, it will be swept away with the wind. The Israeli government will see itself free to settle anyplace it chooses in the West Bank, and the perpetuation of the occupation of millions of Palestinians denied basic rights will become an irreversible fact.
But as most of the Jewish people have seen, the raging response of Benjamin Netanyahu and his ministers to the resolution and the speech indicated total panic, as they pin their hopes on Donald Trump like frightened children who are waiting for their father to come and beat up their attackers. The expectation of a big change in American policy has given them some breathing space in which they can collect themselves somewhat from the shock of the UN resolution.
Despite the arrogant charges against their critics in Israel and abroad, and despite the huge hugs that they are ostensibly exchanging with the incoming U.S. administration, both Naftali Bennettand Netanyahu in particular – who is, unlike most right-wingers, a man of the world – will have a hard time denying what has really happened. Insisting that it was “nothing” won’t help.
There was a clear decision by the democratic world not to allow Israel to commit suicide with its creeping annexation of the territories. There was also a simple and direct address by John Kerry, which exposed at length, during Israel’s most-watched news hour, the utter necessity for Israel to choose quickly between assuring its existence as the democratic state of the Jewish people and the current right-wing policy, which means a binational Muslim state or an apartheid state that won’t be able to stand up to the world. Both have essentially ended the era of right-wing settlement. Following both these events, no U.S. president, including Trump, can grant the right the go ahead and commit suicidal acts that the entire world, including the most important countries on the international scene, have declared again, with surprising intensity, to be illegal.
It appears that except for the U.S. abstention, there wasn’t much new in the Security Council resolution. These condemnations of Israel have been heard for many years, and until now they haven’t had much influence on Israel’s governments. But this time the entire world has told Netanyahu and his ministers that if they dare continue to slowly steal from the Palestinians, not to mention annex the West Bank or parts of it, Israel will find itself being prosecuted in the International Criminal Court in The Hague, and even the most friendly American president will not be able to help, even if he wants to.
If Israel continues to avoid entering serious negotiations that will allow the establishment of a Palestinian state in accordance with the limitations Kerry outlined, both Bennett and Netanyahu will quickly find themselves in a situation in which the only country open to them when they go abroad will be the United States.

Tzvia Greenfield

read more: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.762499

Schermata 2017 01 04 alle 22.43.22


Video Service

Video of the Week: Recent Israel History Miko Peled

Transcription made from The Miko's Speeches




This is a beautiful church so once again thank you to the pastor for allowing us to use this is really beautiful and thank you all for being here tonight and and for caring enough to take the time and listen and participate and be active I always begin my remarks with a disclaimer and that disclaimer is this if anybody here came hoping to hear a balanced presentation then they're going to be sorely disappointed I say this because a lot of things that you're about to hear tonight are difficult to hear and also because I don't believe that a balanced presentation on this topic is possible anybody that cares enough to speak about this probably has a very strong opinion one way or the other almost everybody has feelings and strong emotions on this issue one way or the other for me it's deeply personal and the issue itself is not a balanced issue there is no balance in this issue so therefore I say this because there cannot be a balanced presentation on this and I think if anybody claims that their presentation is balanced they're either misleading themselves or the misleading of their audience this whole issue of Israel and Palestine is covered in so much myth and there's so much there's so much double standard when people talk about this issue and I'll give you two examples

Don't know if you heard Bibi Netanyahu speech at the United Nations I heard it not live but after he actually delivered it and he began and he began it with probably the two most striking examples of myth and double standard and he began by talking about the right of return of the Jews to their ancient homeland and of course the Jews that returned so-called returned to their homeland were not exactly the the same Jews who were expelled from their homeland right because these were expelled a couple of thousand years before that these were not their descendants either because they this is business has been a very long time so these are people the people that actually came back so to speak are people that claim some kind of a heritage some kind of a connection a relationship to the ancient Hebrews and they claimed that they had the right to return to their homeland and this was this is what Zionism was about and this is expected this was you know accepted by the world as the right they had the right to return now if we talk about the right of return of one nation you'd expect that there would be if we accept it as a principle than

Read More>>>>>>>>

Boycott Israeli diamond

Putin s Phone Call With Netanyahu Blew Whistle on Further Israeli Strikes in Syria

                         

                         

Read more ...

Settlers Caught on Film Throwing Stones at Left wing Activists in West Bank

                         

                         

Read more ...

Ahed Tamimi is the Real Wonder Woman: Irish artist on detained teen Palestinian activist

                         

                         

Read more ...

Arent Ahed and Nariman Tamimi women too?

                     

                     

Read more ...

Critics slam ADL for training U.S. police in Israel and when Reddit AMA goes off script

                             

                             

Read more ...

Rachel Corrie death: Israeli ruling bad day for humanity

                                                        

                                                        

Read more ...