twitter twitter  twitter twitter twitter twitter twitter twitter  twitter twitter 

Knesset Gives First Nod to So-called Facebook Bill That Would Allow Court to Censor Internet


If passed into law, legislation would permit court to order social networks to remove content that incites to violence from their sites.
A bill that would give the courts power to block internet content that incites violence received first support by Israeli lawmakers on Tuesday.
The so-called Facebook bill, proposed by Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked and Public Security Minister Gilad Erdan, was approved Tuesday during a first reading in the Knesset plenum, by a majority of 36 to 2.
The draft legislation says that the Administrative Affairs Court will be allowed, at the request of the government, to issue an order instructing social networking companies such as Facebook, Twitter and Google to remove inflammatory content from their sites.
Inflammatory content is defined as presenting a real danger to an individual, the public or the state, and constituting a criminal offense.
The bill will now be brought back to the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee for preparation prior to a second and third reading by the Knesset.
Shaked and Erdan welcomed the results of the first vote. Said Shaked, “I’m happy to continue to promote a law of such great importance in the battle against incitement on the social networks, incitement whose results are destructive and dangerous."
Cooperation with these networks, she added, "will help to reduce the inflammatory material that is posted on a daily basis, and will convey a clear social message that we won’t be tolerant of calls for violence, even if they’re written on a keyboard and appear ‘only’ on screens. Because a single word can turn life into death.”
For his part, Erdan commented that, “Despite the fact that incitement leads to terror, Facebook and other content suppliers on the internet do not accede to police requests to remove content that incites [to violence], and sometimes it takes a long time until this content is removed. Therefore, the new law is necessary in order to give us the tools to act immediately to remove content that is liable to lead to acts of terror and murder.”
On Monday, the Knesset Science and Technology Committee held a discussion about the annual report of the Israel Internet Association, in which the executive director, attorney Yoram Hacohen, spoke about the problematic nature of the proposed legislation.
“Incitement to terror on the social networks is a real problem and solutions must be found – but we don’t think that these are legislative solutions," said Hacohen. "This proposal doesn’t apply only to incitement to terror on the social networks, but relates to a far broader issue. We’re afraid that it will lead to blatant and extensive intervention against the freedom of expression. We are concerned that internet legislation will distort the neutrality of and the manner of thinking on the internet.”

Refaella Goichman

read more:

Schermata 2017 01 04 alle 22.28.43

Video Service

Video of the Week: Recent Israel History Miko Peled

Transcription made from The Miko's Speeches

This is a beautiful church so once again thank you to the pastor for allowing us to use this is really beautiful and thank you all for being here tonight and and for caring enough to take the time and listen and participate and be active I always begin my remarks with a disclaimer and that disclaimer is this if anybody here came hoping to hear a balanced presentation then they're going to be sorely disappointed I say this because a lot of things that you're about to hear tonight are difficult to hear and also because I don't believe that a balanced presentation on this topic is possible anybody that cares enough to speak about this probably has a very strong opinion one way or the other almost everybody has feelings and strong emotions on this issue one way or the other for me it's deeply personal and the issue itself is not a balanced issue there is no balance in this issue so therefore I say this because there cannot be a balanced presentation on this and I think if anybody claims that their presentation is balanced they're either misleading themselves or the misleading of their audience this whole issue of Israel and Palestine is covered in so much myth and there's so much there's so much double standard when people talk about this issue and I'll give you two examples

Don't know if you heard Bibi Netanyahu speech at the United Nations I heard it not live but after he actually delivered it and he began and he began it with probably the two most striking examples of myth and double standard and he began by talking about the right of return of the Jews to their ancient homeland and of course the Jews that returned so-called returned to their homeland were not exactly the the same Jews who were expelled from their homeland right because these were expelled a couple of thousand years before that these were not their descendants either because they this is business has been a very long time so these are people the people that actually came back so to speak are people that claim some kind of a heritage some kind of a connection a relationship to the ancient Hebrews and they claimed that they had the right to return to their homeland and this was this is what Zionism was about and this is expected this was you know accepted by the world as the right they had the right to return now if we talk about the right of return of one nation you'd expect that there would be if we accept it as a principle than

Read More>>>>>>>>

Boycott Israeli diamond

Gaza the Laboratory for the Future of Drone Warfare



Read more ...

Video Djamy Ross Palestine Official Clip



Djamy Ross - PALESTINE (clip officiel) English subtitles

Read more ...

NATO wants to attack Russia starting World War III



Read more ...