twitter twitter  twitter twitter twitter twitter twitter twitter  twitter twitter 

UN Security Council Set to Vote on Israeli Settlements; Netanyahu Calls for U.S. Veto


The Egyptian move surprised Israel, the United States and a large part of the Security Council's members despite warm ties between Netanyahu and Sissi. U.S. position uncertain.
Egypt presented the UN Security Council on Wednesday night with a draft resolution against Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and wishes to hold a vote on it on Thursday, at 3 P.M. local time (10 P.M. Israel time).
The Egyptian move surprised Israel, the United States and a large part of the Security Council's members, a senior Israeli official noted. The draft resolution states that the settlements have "no legal validity" and that Israel must completely halt settlement construction. It also calls on the international community to clearly distinct between Israel proper and the settlements.
Officials at the Foreign Ministry and the Prime Minister's Office had expected that a draft resolution against the settlements would be presented to the Security Council by the time U.S. President Barack Obama leaves the White House on January 20. The Palestinians circulated a draft proposal some two weeks ago, as did New Zealand.
However, the "high-alert" preparedness level in Jerusalem slightly decreased in recent days, after a meeting of the foreign ministers of the Arab League concluded in Cairo on Monday without reaching a decision to promote a Security Council resolution, according to the information Israel received on the matter.
On Wednesday night, the Egyptians circulated their draft proposal to Security Council members without giving any prior notice to Israel, despite the supposedly warm relations between Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Egyptian President Abdel-Fattah al-Sissi. Members of the Israeli delegation to the UN held preliminary consultations overnight with the representatives of the Security Council's members, particularly the U.S. Senior Israeli officials noted that the Americans, as well as other countries' representatives, said that they were also surprised by the Egyptian move.
According to the senior Israeli officials, the Americans have yet to decide how they will vote. The White House and the State Department did not respond on the matter. Netanyahu, meanwhile, tweeted that "The U.S. should veto the anti-Israel resolution at the UN Security Council on Thursday."
In recent months, Netanyahu expressed his concern that toward the end of his term Obama would refrain from vetoing a resolution on the settlements at the Security Council. Since taking office in 2009, Obama vetoed a resolution presented to the Security Council once – in February 2011, when the Palestinians brought to a vote a resolution against the settlements.
The Egyptian draft resolution is a little milder than the versions circulated by the Palestinians in the past two weeks. According to the text itself, the resolution:
■ "Reaffirms that the establishment by Israel of settlements in the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law and a major obstacle to the achievement of the two-state solution."
■ "Reiterates its demand that Israel immediately and completely cease all settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem."
Stresses that the cessation of all Israeli settlement activities is essential for salvaging the two-state solution, and calls for affirmative steps to be taken immediately to reverse the negative trends on the ground that are imperiling the two-state solution."
■ "Underlines that it will not recognize any changes to the 4 June 1967 lines, including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties through negotiations."
■ "Calls upon all States, to distinguish, in their relevant dealings, between the territory of the State of Israel and the territories occupied since 1967."
■ "Calls for immediate steps to prevent all acts of violence against civilians, including acts of terror, as well as all acts of provocation and destruction, calls for accountability in this regard, and calls for compliance with obligations under international law for the strengthening of ongoing efforts to combat terrorism, including through existing security coordination, and to clearly condemn all acts of terrorism; and to refrain from provocative actions, incitement and inflammatory rhetoric."

Barak Ravid

read more: 2016 12 22 alle 23.13.27

Video Service

Video of the Week: Recent Israel History Miko Peled

Transcription made from The Miko's Speeches

This is a beautiful church so once again thank you to the pastor for allowing us to use this is really beautiful and thank you all for being here tonight and and for caring enough to take the time and listen and participate and be active I always begin my remarks with a disclaimer and that disclaimer is this if anybody here came hoping to hear a balanced presentation then they're going to be sorely disappointed I say this because a lot of things that you're about to hear tonight are difficult to hear and also because I don't believe that a balanced presentation on this topic is possible anybody that cares enough to speak about this probably has a very strong opinion one way or the other almost everybody has feelings and strong emotions on this issue one way or the other for me it's deeply personal and the issue itself is not a balanced issue there is no balance in this issue so therefore I say this because there cannot be a balanced presentation on this and I think if anybody claims that their presentation is balanced they're either misleading themselves or the misleading of their audience this whole issue of Israel and Palestine is covered in so much myth and there's so much there's so much double standard when people talk about this issue and I'll give you two examples

Don't know if you heard Bibi Netanyahu speech at the United Nations I heard it not live but after he actually delivered it and he began and he began it with probably the two most striking examples of myth and double standard and he began by talking about the right of return of the Jews to their ancient homeland and of course the Jews that returned so-called returned to their homeland were not exactly the the same Jews who were expelled from their homeland right because these were expelled a couple of thousand years before that these were not their descendants either because they this is business has been a very long time so these are people the people that actually came back so to speak are people that claim some kind of a heritage some kind of a connection a relationship to the ancient Hebrews and they claimed that they had the right to return to their homeland and this was this is what Zionism was about and this is expected this was you know accepted by the world as the right they had the right to return now if we talk about the right of return of one nation you'd expect that there would be if we accept it as a principle than

Read More>>>>>>>>

Boycott Israeli diamond

Nikki Haley Wows pro-Israel Lobby AIPAC: For Me, She’s the Next President



Read more ...

Ahed Tamimi: One story multiple narratives



Read more ...

Acting on Orders Israeli Soldiers Assaulted Journalists to Prevent Media Coverage



Read more ...

Benjamin Netanyahu is pathological liar and a political psychopath



Read more ...

Miko Peled Journey of an Israeli in Palestine Seattle. Oct. 1, 2012



Read more ...

Why UN should say “good riddance” to Israel



Read more ...