• Kbnews
  • Bdm News
  • Abbas Retracts Claim That Rabbis Called for Poisoning of Palestinian Wells
twitter twitter  twitter twitter twitter twitter twitter twitter  twitter twitter 

Zionism Has Reached the End of the Road

If it is a movement of national liberation, then liberation has been achieved, and it is impossible to go on being liberated forever.

Ten days after declaring Israel’s independence, David Ben-Gurion said at a May 24, 1948 meeting of the Haganah’s general staff: “We must immediately destroy Ramle and Lod. ... We must organize Eliyahu’s brigade to direct it against Jenin in preparation for the Jordan Valley. ... Maklef needs to receive reinforcements and his role is the conquest of southern Lebanon, with the aid of bombing Tyre, Sidon and Beirut. ... Yigal Allon must attack in Syria from the east and from the north. ... We must establish a Christian state whose southern border will be the Litani [River]. We will forge an alliance with it. When we break the strength of the [Arab] Legion and bomb Amman we will eliminate Transjordan too, and then Syria falls. And if Egypt still dares to fight, we will bomb Port Said, Alexandria and Cairo.”
Yes, that was Ben-Gurion, not Napoleon Bonaparte. He promised at the same time: “That is how we will end the war – and make a reckoning of our forefathers with Egypt, Assyria and Aramea.”
By the way, some of these “promises” were fulfilled some time later. During Operation Horev in December 1948, Israel captured Egyptian territory, and withdrew only after the British Air Force intervened. In 1967 Israel, as is known, was under existential threat, but after the Six-Day War it tripled its territory.
So why do things look different? Haim Margaliot Kalvarisky, a central figure in the Zionist movement, wrote in 1937: “It turns out that we have put out our hand for peace, but took it back right away, when the other side expressed its interest in accepting it. This dangerous game did not help to raise our honor in their eyes as honest people, and the accusation that they blame us for, that we are conducting two-faced politics: On one hand we pretend as if we are asking for an agreement, and on the other hand we only want to gain time – is not baseless.” (Taken from Aharon Cohen’s book, “Yisrael Ve’ha’olam Ha’aravi” [“Israel and the Arab World”], published in Hebrew in 1964.)
This is Zionism for those observing from the sidelines. After all, if the Zionist aspiration was the establishment of a national home for the Jews, it was possible to do everything so the harm to the Palestinians would be minimal; but the dominant leaders of the Zionist movement thought in terms of empire.
So the time has come for some courageous soul searching. After all, if Zionism is a movement of national liberation, then liberation has been achieved, and it is impossible to go on being liberated forever. If Zionism has come to redeem the land, then the Arabs no longer have room for a cemetery. If Zionism is a movement for ingathering of the exiles, then to continue with this enterprise we must establish a global conversion operation.
Zionism has reached the end of its road, both inside Israel and in the region. After all, it is impossible to continue to act with a colonial mentality towards Israel’s Arab citizens: To rob them of a dunam here and a dunam there. Zionism has gone bankrupt in the region too. The war of Armageddon is going on around us, and no one there acknowledges the Jewish state with even a single look of hatred. At a time when all the prophecies of fury are coming true – the rise of fanatical movements and chaos spreading throughout the region – no one there is thinking about Israel. Not about Haifa and not about Jaffa. Only Benjamin Netanyahu bothers to remind the Palestinians: Nu, what about Jaffa?
Across the border, Bashar Assad has not involved Israel in the war raging in his country, and the forces fighting there do not relate to Israel. The Islamic State in Sinai acts against Egyptian forces and shows no great interest in Israel. In truth, the Arab world has chutzpah! It plays by itself, and does not want to let Israel join the game for which it has been preparing itself for generations.
Zionism has a bad name among Arabs not because it espoused the establishment of a national home for the Jews. After all, “national home” was the excuse for implementing grandiose regional plans, which had no connection whatsoever to a national home.
Examine yourselves courageously.

Odeh Bisharat

Haaretz Contributor

read more: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.739676Schermata 2016 09 01 alle 22.14.56

Video Service

Video of the Week: Recent Israel History Miko Peled

Transcription made from The Miko's Speeches

This is a beautiful church so once again thank you to the pastor for allowing us to use this is really beautiful and thank you all for being here tonight and and for caring enough to take the time and listen and participate and be active I always begin my remarks with a disclaimer and that disclaimer is this if anybody here came hoping to hear a balanced presentation then they're going to be sorely disappointed I say this because a lot of things that you're about to hear tonight are difficult to hear and also because I don't believe that a balanced presentation on this topic is possible anybody that cares enough to speak about this probably has a very strong opinion one way or the other almost everybody has feelings and strong emotions on this issue one way or the other for me it's deeply personal and the issue itself is not a balanced issue there is no balance in this issue so therefore I say this because there cannot be a balanced presentation on this and I think if anybody claims that their presentation is balanced they're either misleading themselves or the misleading of their audience this whole issue of Israel and Palestine is covered in so much myth and there's so much there's so much double standard when people talk about this issue and I'll give you two examples

Don't know if you heard Bibi Netanyahu speech at the United Nations I heard it not live but after he actually delivered it and he began and he began it with probably the two most striking examples of myth and double standard and he began by talking about the right of return of the Jews to their ancient homeland and of course the Jews that returned so-called returned to their homeland were not exactly the the same Jews who were expelled from their homeland right because these were expelled a couple of thousand years before that these were not their descendants either because they this is business has been a very long time so these are people the people that actually came back so to speak are people that claim some kind of a heritage some kind of a connection a relationship to the ancient Hebrews and they claimed that they had the right to return to their homeland and this was this is what Zionism was about and this is expected this was you know accepted by the world as the right they had the right to return now if we talk about the right of return of one nation you'd expect that there would be if we accept it as a principle than

Read More>>>>>>>>

Boycott Israeli diamond

Putin s Phone Call With Netanyahu Blew Whistle on Further Israeli Strikes in Syria



Read more ...

Settlers Caught on Film Throwing Stones at Left wing Activists in West Bank



Read more ...

Ahed Tamimi is the Real Wonder Woman: Irish artist on detained teen Palestinian activist



Read more ...

Another Cold Blood ExtraJudicial Killing 14 yo girl Palestinians in Jerusalem



Read more ...

Examining Ten Myths about Israel, by Ilan Pappe



Read more ...

Rapper Vic Mensa Slams Israel's Treatment of Palestinian



Read more ...